RiskProfiler wins 120 G2 nods across 31 categories
Fri, 10th Jul 2026 (Today)
RiskProfiler received 120 recognitions across 31 categories in G2's Summer 2026 reports, spanning cybersecurity and risk management software.
The recognitions covered areas including third-party and supplier risk management, exposure management platforms, attack surface management, threat intelligence, governance, risk and compliance, risk-based vulnerability management, and digital risk protection.
G2 rankings are based on user reviews and market presence data, and software suppliers often use them as a proxy for customer sentiment in crowded technology markets. RiskProfiler highlighted distinctions including Best Estimated ROI, Best Results, Fastest Implementation, Most Implementable, Best Relationship, Best Support, Users Most Likely to Recommend, Momentum Leader, and High Performer.
The results come as companies face greater scrutiny of cyber exposure across supply chains and external partners. Security teams are under pressure to assess vendors more quickly while tracking a broader range of risks linked to digital suppliers, cloud services, and AI-related threats.
Buyer priorities
RiskProfiler argued that enterprise customers are placing more weight on measurable returns, faster deployment, and tools that reduce manual work. That reflects a broader shift in the security software market, where buyers are increasingly asked to justify spending through operational results rather than compliance alone.
It said its standing in the reports reflected demand for continuous, intelligence-led third-party risk management rather than periodic assessments. That approach has gained traction as organisations move from questionnaire-based vendor reviews to ongoing monitoring of supplier exposure.
RiskProfiler maintains an average rating of 4.9 out of 5 on G2, according to the company, which said customer feedback has been consistently positive on implementation, usability, and overall customer experience.
Setu Parimi, Co-Founder and Chief Technology Officer at RiskProfiler, linked the recognitions to changes in how customers assess security tools.
"Third-party risk management has moved well beyond compliance," said Setu Parimi, Co-Founder and CTO at RiskProfiler. "Organisations are looking for platforms that can deliver measurable business outcomes, accelerate onboarding, simplify operations, and enable security teams to make faster, more informed decisions. Our G2 Summer 2026 recognition reflects what customers increasingly expect from modern third-party risk platforms."
He also pointed to the growing role of artificial intelligence in helping companies decide which threats deserve attention first.
"As AI reshapes cybersecurity, organisations will increasingly look beyond identifying more risks to understanding which risks actually matter. Intelligent automation will play a critical role in helping security teams make that shift at scale," Parimi said.
Customer example
RiskProfiler also cited customer testimony to support its claim that buyers are seeking practical results from third-party risk software. One user said the platform had reduced the time needed to assess vendors and improved visibility into supplier exposure.
"RiskProfiler transformed how we manage third-party cyber risk. We reduced vendor assessment time by more than 70%, gained continuous visibility into supplier risks, and the context needed to prioritise what truly matters," said Kamran Siddique, Chief Information Security Officer at Steve Madden.
RiskProfiler focuses on external threat intelligence and products that help companies identify risks beyond their own networks. Its services cover brand monitoring, dark web intelligence, attack surface management, and third-party risk management.
The latest G2 results suggest that vendors in the cyber risk market are being judged not only on technical breadth but also on deployment speed, support, and evidence of business impact. That is particularly relevant in third-party risk management, where large enterprises often struggle with fragmented workflows, slow supplier reviews, and limited visibility across partner ecosystems.
For software buyers, rankings that emphasise implementation and return on investment may carry added weight at a time when security budgets remain under pressure. For suppliers, they offer a way to stand out in increasingly competitive categories as companies shift from periodic checks to continuous monitoring of external exposure.
RiskProfiler said the recognitions spanned multiple regions and customer segments, indicating broader adoption among organisations of different sizes.